The FDA, the regulating authority in the sphere of medical device circulation of the United States, issued guidance providing additional information on new pilot conformity assessment procedures. 

ASCA: key points 

The Accreditation Scheme for Conformity Assessment (ASCA) is a special procedure introduced by the FDA to improve the efficiency of medical device assessment procedures utilized nowadays. According to the new procedure, medical device manufacturers applying for approval would be able to use submission testing results provided by third-party laboratories accredited by the FDA. This approach would allow substantial simplification of the process of reviewing applications since the safety and efficiency of the device would be already confirmed by a third-party laboratory. 

To be able to participate in ASCA, the third party laboratory needs to pass the FDA accreditation, confirming the compliance with applicable standards. For this purpose, the FDA provides a list of standards that should be applied during the conformity assessment. During the first stage of the pilot project, the following categories of standards would be utilized:

  • Basic Safety and Essential Performance of Medical Electrical Equipment, Medical Electrical Systems, and Laboratory Medical Equipment
  • Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices. 

The particular list of standards applied would include ones issued by IEC, ISO, ANSI and other organizations specializing in the development of standards. According to the position of the FDA, the numerous standards used would provide improved efficiency.  All applicable standards are already recognized by the regulating authority. 

 

Pilot program details 

The guidance issued by the FDA covers a wide scope of issues related to the rights and obligations of all parties involved in the process including the roles of accredited laboratories.

The guidance also provides the requirements laboratories should meet to be eligible to apply for accreditation. The agency also provides detailed information on the way testing results would be evaluated during the application reviewal performed by regulating authority. According to the general rule set forth in the guidance, testing results provided by the accredited third-party laboratory would be valid. The regulating authority confirms that the examination method applied in the particular laboratory would be subject to either periodical audit or additional audit required in case of any issues related to the safety and efficiency of the devices examined by that laboratory. 

The approach used by the FDA looks similar to one applied by the European Commission, the European Union’s regulating authority. At the same time, despite the distribution of examination workload, the legal status of EU notified bodies (NBs) and US accredited laboratories differ substantially. In comparison to the EU NBs, accredited laboratories would be empowered only to perform conformity assessment, while notified bodies would be able to hold medical device registration procedures. Both approaches have a similar goal: to improve the efficiency of procedures related to premarketing application reviewing. 

 

How RegDesk Can Help

RegDesk platform provides medical device manufacturers with reliable and detailed information on changes to the most important regulations in a timely manner. The information provided is necessary to comply with applicable rules and regulations in the sphere of manufacturing, importation, distribution and post-marketing maintenance of medical devices.

7 Comments

  1. I just want to say I am just new to blogging and certainly liked your web-site. Probably I’m planning to bookmark your site . You definitely come with beneficial article content. Bless you for revealing your web page.

    Reply
  2. Absolutely pent subject matter, appreciate it for selective information .

    Reply
  3. This website is truly a walk-through for every one of the info you desired concerning this and also didn?t recognize who to ask. Look here, as well as you?ll absolutely uncover it.

    Reply
  4. I intended to compose you one very little observation in order to thank you yet again for all the beautiful basics you have provided above. This has been certainly generous with people like you to supply extensively what numerous people could have offered for an e-book to earn some bucks for themselves, particularly since you could have tried it if you ever desired. Those suggestions additionally served as the fantastic way to fully grasp that other people have a similar zeal much like my own to know the truth many more pertaining to this matter. I know there are numerous more fun sessions ahead for many who check out your blog.

    Reply
  5. Have you ever considered publishing an e-book or guest authoring on other blogs? I have a blog centered on the same information you discuss and would love to have you share some stories/information. I know my subscribers would enjoy your work. If you’re even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an email.

    Reply
  6. Incredible! This blog looks exactly like my old one! It’s on a entirely different topic but it has pretty much the same page layout and design. Outstanding choice of colors!

    Reply
  7. Nice article. I find out something much more tough on different blogs day-to-day. It will constantly be boosting to review content from other authors as well as practice a little something from their store. I?d choose to utilize some with the material on my blog site whether you don?t mind. Natually I?ll provide you a link on your internet blog. Thanks for sharing.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *